MISSION STATEMENT

This website is to serve as a catalog of historical information for various tanks, across various stages of development, created for use by the United States from Pre-WWII through to the 1970s. However, the primary purpose for this website is to illustrate a proposal for what an "endgame" could look like for the US tech tree in the game, World Of Tanks, and to show that there's still plenty of life left to breathed into this game.

My aim is to see as many tanks in the game about tanks as possible, and I hope to show that in a way that respects both the historicity of the tanks shown and the balance of the game overall. As such, I will not be going into great detail on individual statistics. Rather, I will only be showing the possible modules for each tank, changes that could be made to make it more historically authentic, a historical overview, and how the tank's playstyle may be represented in-game. I will also attempt to future-proof this by including alternate hulls, half-tracks, and wheeled vehicles.

This is certainly not perfect and everything is subject to change. This is still a work in progress, and updates are frequent if not daily. This is a fan project and a labor of love. Do enjoy.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

Concept IVB



In July 1981, a report was submitted in close collaboration with the artillery system engineering working group (ASEWG) to develop a generation of concept self-propelled howitzers with anti-armor capabilities, along with all their various support systems. The M109A2, dubbed Class I, was used as a baseline from which these various concepts were drawn up and compared to. The main commonality between all concepts was that they used 155 mm howitzers.

Class IV sought a unique way to react to the counterbattery threat. It was decided that this class of concepts should be optimized to operate at incredibly long distances, to the point where 90% of enemy artillery simply had too short of a firing range. Both concepts IVA and IVB were casemate SPHs experimenting with different types of ammunition. IVA's was rocket-boosted whereas IVB's simply used a larger cannon.



A drawing detailing the autoreloading mechanism for the Concept IVB.

As with the previously described Concept A, the Concept IVB takes advantage of the autoreloading mechanic and should get an additional shell (four instead of three), essentially turning the vehicle into a worse, non-turreted B-C 155 58. In exchange for the downsides of the mechanic and the lack of a turret, it should see a reasonable degree of accuracy and an above-average muzzle velocity and firing range, considering the long-range capabilities of the tank.



Guns: 155 mm HTB III Cannon (autoreloader)

Engines: Cummins VTA-903-T660 (660 hp)

Suspensions/Alternate Hulls, Total Weight (metric tons): Concept IVB (32.66)

Hull Armor (mm): 32/32/32

Top Speed: 61 km/h

Crew: 3 (Driver/Loader; Gunner/Loader; Commander/Radio)



Parent: Concept A

Sources:
Harvey Garver & Harold Liberman, Special Publications ARLCD-SP-81003 (AD-A102819), 1981

No comments:

Post a Comment