However, tests at Fort Knox concluded the T23 was inadequate for combat use. Difficulty maintaining the vehicle was the overwhelming factor behind its rejection. In April 1943, it was recommended that the T23 use a torsion bar suspension. These tanks would be designated T23E3. The turret was improved by relocating the equipment previously supported by the turret platform.
In July 1943, it was proposed to standardize the T23E3 as the M27 medium tank, and at the same time standardize the T20E3 as the M27B1. However, the T25 and T26 medium tanks were showing more promise than the T23E3, so the standardization was not approved.
As with the T22 and the T20, all the previous weapons from the T22 can carry over to the T23. However, I've also gone and given it the 90 mm Gun T7. While the 90 mm was never installed on a T23 chassis, the 90 mm was in fact installed in a modified T23E3 turret. This turret would then be mounted on the T25 chassis, becoming the first T25 pilot. So while it may be historically inaccurate to put the gun here, I wouldn't say it's inauthentic. Plus, I think it's necessary to help balance the tank for Tier VII.
Of the "Pershing" family of medium tanks at Tier VII, this tank occupies the far end of the spectrum. It has great mobility and gun handling, but the worst armor and gun options. The T26E5 is then its polar opposite, with the best armor, but the worst mobility and gun characteristics.
76 mm Gun M1A2; 90 mm Gun T7
Engines: Ford GAF (500 hp); Ford GAN (525 hp)
Turrets (Turret Armor (mm)): T23 (89/64/64); T23E3 (89/64/64)
Suspensions/Alternate Hulls, Total Weight (metric tons): T23 VVSS (32.65); T23E3 TBS (36.01)
Hull Armor (mm): 76/50/38
Top Speed: 56 km/h
Crew: 5 (Driver; Gunner; Loader; Commander; Radio)
Parent: T22
Children: T42, M-4/5
See Also: T23 AT, T23 Pilot #1, T23 Pilot #2, T25, M26 Pershing, T26E5
Hunnicutt, R. P. Pershing, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment